Talk:Cuerdale Hoard

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Text dump

edit

Text of the original report, checked against its source, should be transfered to Wikisource. Technically over my head, unfortunately. --Wetman (talk) 13:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article now has two text-dump appendages, cut and pasted from Internet sites. This should be handled with footnote links.--Wetman (talk) 02:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. Wikisource transfer would simply entail creating the article, cutting and pasting it from here, preferably categorizing it, and using {{Wikisource}} to link to it from here. Footnotes can be done using refgroups, e.g. <ref group="hnnn">Spliced from multiple sources by some kind of textual rogue taxidermist.</ref>{{reflist|group="hnnn"}}. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 01:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The original report

edit

Should this section be copied over to WikiSource and a link added? Nev1 (talk) 12:56, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cuerdale Hoard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply