Talk:Crystalline (song)

Suggesting move to The Crystalline Series

Since the release is really a subproject of the Biophilia concept, it would make more sense not to have an article on just the song "Crystalline". As it is, the series releases and "Cosmogony" are just shoe-horned in. Any objections to the move? ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 04:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles about songs are supposed to be just that, about individual songs. So I'm against the move that just happened recently and also your proposed one. –anemoneprojectors– 13:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

UK Coalition Singles Chart

I've never heard of this chart, nor does it have a wikipedia page, but it is provided by The Official Charts Company. Can it be included in the charts section? [1] "Crystalline" went number one on the chart. Burnberrytree (talk) 22:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crystalline (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111206094915/http://www.bjork.fr/Later-with-Jools-Holland-2011 to http://www.bjork.fr/Later-with-Jools-Holland-2011
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110923235354/http://shop.bjork.com/Store/DisplayItems-10-0-0.html to http://shop.bjork.com/Store/DisplayItems-10-0-0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)