Talk:Cry (Michael Jackson song)/GA2

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Crystal Clear x3 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrrhus16 13:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be your reviewer for today. I will be back shortly with some comments and suggestions. Pyrrhus16 13:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    Reasonably well done; I made a few tweaks during my copyedit.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):  
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    I have passed the GA nomination of this article, having made a few tweaks and changes during my copyedit. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review.

Pyrrhus16 19:43, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 20:01, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply