Talk:Cruise ship pollution
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cruise ship pollution redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Neutrality, Essay, Long Quotations edit
This article seems to only point out negative facts about cruise ship pollution and provides very little neutral points of view. i.e.:There isn't a section regarding cruise line efforts to reduce wastes or pollutants. There is also not a historical section. The article appears to be written in a very essay like style with one point of view and contains excessively long quotations that may constitute plagiarism. Spitfire19 (Talk) 15:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Not Neutral, should be merged with ship pollution edit
First, cruise ships make up less than 1 percent of the shipping industry, therefore, it shouldn't have it's own page. It would do better to be merged under "ship pollution." Also, the word "pollution" indicates that all ships pollute and is biased. The truth is cruise ships have very advanced systems onboard -- especially when it comes to treating wastewater. It should be called "Shipping Environmental Impact" (Pipsta27 (talk) 21:43, 16 December 2010 (UTC))