Talk:Crowdsensing

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Espionage Low‑importance

	Crowdsensing is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 9 January 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. I gotta do a page swap anyways, so that helps. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Mobile crowdsensing → Crowdsensing – It doesn't necessarily involve mobile phones and if the article doesn't yet include information on other types of crowdsensing it could and should be expanded. Also 'crowdsensing' as a standalone term is the more commonly used term. Fixuture (talk) 22:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. JudgeRM (talk to me) 20:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Support per this AFD discussion. The crowdsensing article was redirected here because this is a better article and it covers the topic sufficiently. We can and should move this to the more concise name. Brad v 21:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Relisting comment: This is complicated. Text from this old version of the target seems to have been merged into the current article, so its page history should be preserved for CCA etc. purposes. Perhaps the best way of doing that would be to merge the content from this article to that location, almost a cut-and-paste move but valid in this circumstance, see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. As noted above (the post crossed mine and led to an edit conflict) another consideration is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdsensing where consensus was to redirect to the current title, perhaps not the best decision. Interested in other suggestions. There's a case for move, it's just how to best achieve it. Andrewa (talk) 21:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Whoever closes this can do a WP:SWAP, preserving the history of both pages. A copy-and-paste move would be ill-advised. Brad v 21:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
That would work too. The end result is much the same. Just so long as what is done is documented. Andrewa (talk) 23:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic