Talk:Cross Sound Cable

Latest comment: 6 months ago by 207.180.169.36 in topic current ownership?

Requests for Clarification edit

"The cable has since been operating and, generally, sells electricity from the New England power grid to the Northeast power grid." This doesn't seem exactly clear. New England is located in the Northeast U.S., so these two regions seem to be the same thing. The cable runs from Connecticut to Long Island, and neither "New England" or "Northeast" equate obviously to either region. Can anyone fix this sentence to whatever the meaning ought to be? Thanks. -- Kadin2048 23:58, 11 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Environmental hazards in merely operating it? edit

I can imagine how creating a trench and laying the cable might cause environmental damage, but after that has already been done, how would flipping the switch cause environmental damage? -- 71.112.8.192 06:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Elementary conservatism. The Glen Cove connection is AC. AC is old, thus natural, thus safe. The Shorham connection is DC. DC is new, thus unnatural, thus unsafe. Yes, the sylogism illustrates that conservatism is sometimes stupid, and that stupidity doesn't always preclude political power. Jim.henderson 04:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Isn't DC older than AC though? Edison's DC system was the standard in the US, but then Tesla came along with AC. Edison tried to scare people about this new mysterious AC by electrocuting elephants and stuff. KenFehling (talk) 06:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
One had been longer in use, while the other has been longer under the sea. Conservatives in this case are alarmed by the latter question, not the former. Jim.henderson (talk) 23:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cross Sound Cable. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

current ownership? edit

The last graf says it was sold to Babcock & Brown in 2006. The linked article says B&B, an Australian investment firm, went into liquidation in 2009. Someone else must have owned CSC for the last 13 years — who? 207.180.169.36 (talk) 17:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply