Talk:Croatian submarine Velebit

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Croatian submarine Velebit (P-01)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nick-D (talk · contribs) 04:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments

This article is in very good shape, and I have only the following comments:

• The submarine is referred to as both a "ship" and a "boat": I'd suggest standardising on one term (boat is more common in English language publications, but I don't know what the norm would be for Croatia)
• "within the base" - please specify which base is being referred to here
• I've given the article a light copy edit, which I hope is OK
• I like the self-created photos! Nick-D (talk) 05:03, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

I've made an edit so it uses "boat" through the entire article; that sounds about right considering submarines are almost always referred to as boats. I've also added "within the Lora naval base" to specify its current location. Feel free do edit anything you think is needed or just let me know, and thanks!--Saxum (talk) 12:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

That looks good to me, and I'm pleased to pass this nomination. Nick-D (talk) 01:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!--Saxum (talk) 10:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Assessment

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Croatian submarine Velebit (P-01). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230235252/http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/15136/jedina-hrvatska-podmornica-velebit-ne-moze-zaroniti to http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/15136/jedina-hrvatska-podmornica-velebit-ne-moze-zaroniti
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131127004547/http://arhiva.morh.hr/katalog/documents/dpr_final.pdf to http://arhiva.morh.hr/katalog/documents/dpr_final.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)