Talk:Criticism of the Anti-Defamation League
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Anti-Defamation League. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
This page was created on the model of other organization pages see:Human Rights Watch on which the volume of criticism can overwhelm the page.Historicist (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Your speedy deletion tagging of Criticism of Anti-Defamation League edit
This is not really criticism, but an article about such criticism, as a branch off of the main article, Anti-Defamation League. Such practice is common to keep articles as short as possible, especially if the new sub-article has enough content, references and notability to merit its own article anyway. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
I think you should reconsider. Controversial organizations that do good work, like the ADL and Human rights Watch attract critics who overwhelm their pages. User:Cobaltbluetony is quite correct in pointing out that its is routine solution.Historicist (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
the above copied from the talk page of User:HellinabucketHistoricist (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Neutrality edit
This page was created by cutting and pasting the criticism section on the ADL page. It is far form NPOV.Historicist (talk) 18:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)