Talk:Criticism of Netflix

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Legal issues and controversies surrounding Netflix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100109161945/http://www.slashfilm.com/article.php/20061116twchomeentertainment to http://www.slashfilm.com/article.php/20061116twchomeentertainment
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812190131/http://www.westonfirm.com/Netflix-Complaint.pdf to http://www.westonfirm.com/Netflix-Complaint.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

I've reviewed the edit and the links found by the bot were indeed broken and correctly amended with new links using the waybackmachine. Strongexpresso (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Nothing about firing every actor that was allegedly involve with sexual misconduct?

even when no official complaints were made or been reviewed by police or the justice system? Okay... If my English was better I would have done t my self. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.126.32.191 (talk) 20:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

13 Reasons Why and suicdie rate:

The idea that a netflix series may have had an effect on the suicide rate falls under WP:MEDRS which requires a higher standard of evidence than simple newspaper reporting. The reason for this is because so much medical reporting is sloppy and misleading. Harizotoh9 (talk) 02:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Cuties

Myself and others have reverted unsourced section added by Doady who has added it back such as here. This section is unsourced personal opinion and needs third party sources. Harizotoh9 (talk) 04:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

See my response to Harizotoh9's claims on Talk:Netflix#Cuties. Doady (talk) 22:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Multiple users on multiple pages have reverted your edits. You need to build a consensus before adding them back. Harizotoh9 (talk) 03:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

• As has been explained to you, since you are trying to make a plainly WP:EXCEPTIONAL statement which involves interpretation and analysis of the source, you need a WP:SECONDARY reliable source to cite it to. You cannot cite Cuties itself, because that would mean you are, in effect, performing your own original research on it, producing your own interpretation and analysis, and then trying to use Wikipedia to advance that analysis. Given the exceptional nature of the claims you are making, there should be significant secondary sourcing if it is true and noteworthy. --Aquillion (talk) 06:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Cancelling shows after one season

Several high-profile cancellations have been in the news lately, it's the most common criticism I think of when I think of Netflix 24.29.210.35 (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)