Talk:Critical Buddhism

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 124.78.209.178 in topic The term of Folk Buddhism....

FYI... edit

--222.64.216.226 (talk) 11:43, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Topical buddhism -- why not...??? edit

Amitābha pure land has got 9 levels of boddhisattivas and perhaps the lowerst 3 may called topical...^__^...??? --222.64.216.226 (talk) 11:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oooops, not 9 levels of boddhisattivas, but 9 grades of human beings who are willing to go to Amitābha's pure land, according to Contemplation Sutra--222.67.215.92 (talk) 01:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Is the specifications of the nine grades equivalent to Nyingma's Nine Yana...???...and I wish to get the Google scholar's relevant info though.--222.67.215.92 (talk) 01:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

FYI...

--222.67.207.78 (talk) 01:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--222.67.215.92 (talk) 01:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--222.67.215.92 (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

In response to the term of topical buddhism

--222.64.216.226 (talk) 12:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Analogue to this topic info... edit

--58.38.46.45 (talk) 07:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--222.67.214.133 (talk) 04:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--222.67.214.133 (talk) 05:03, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--222.64.209.88 (talk) 05:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Chinese translation of the term is based on the following.... edit

--222.64.209.88 (talk) 06:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The term of Folk Buddhism.... edit

FYI...

--222.64.209.88 (talk) 06:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--124.78.209.178 (talk) 10:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

and others

--58.38.46.45 (talk) 07:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--222.64.209.88 (talk) 06:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--222.64.209.88 (talk) 06:51, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--222.64.209.88 (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--124.78.209.178 (talk) 10:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--124.78.209.178 (talk) 10:34, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--124.78.209.178 (talk) 10:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

--124.78.209.178 (talk) 10:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply