Talk:Crissy Moran

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Image Image:Crissy_moran.jpg was removed from page due to possible copyright violation. — RJH 22:04, 17 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced text edit

I have removed the following because this was not referenced:

In early 2006, Crissy received new breast implants.

Please provide a verifiable reference and reinsert into the article as appropriate. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 23:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


~I'm sorry, I did not know that I had to do that. How can I verify it? It is talked about often on her forums and you can clearly see it in her recent photos. Any help would be great.~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Letsgomets1212 (talkcontribs)

No problem. Just remember in the future to cite your sources (and make sure those sources are verifiable. Now, as for the problem of confirming this... pictures or forum postings are not considered source materials. (Comparing pictures, for instance, is personal research, which goes against the no original research clause.) If you can find an article, interview or news item that states this fact, then we can use that. Thanks. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 22:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Does this help I run Crissy Moran blog and she writes on it http://www.crissym.ws/2005/10/boobs-healing-nicely-and-new-puppy/

Last year she did get a boob job to replace her existing ones

I edited the page per Crissy's request on her official Facebook page. Here is a the status update that she posted:

"Does anyone know how to go about editing a wikipedia page????

There isn't anything on my page about Treasures (who I work- for www.iamatreasure.com) but there are links to other organizations that don't have anything to do with me. They keep appearing even though I have had them taken down and asked them to stop putting them up.

Plus, it has a link to the anti-porn movement which is something I have never claimed I choose to define myself by what I am for and that would be the same mission as Treasures- "Our mission is to empower women in the discovery of their value and purpose by providing mentorship, spiritual encouragement and resources in order to equip them to live healthy, flourishing lives".

Help." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirpoins (talkcontribs) 09:36, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Picture edit

Can somebody please post a picture of her on her page. I would, but the rules on what pictures you can and can't post on here are complicated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Letsgomets1212 (talkcontribs)

If anyone can take a picture of her and release it under a copyleft license, that would do nicely. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 21:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I changed the picture, 1. because it is not a fair representation of Crissy now. 2. It was taken from a porn website. 3. The new picture was taken by myself. Thenext (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The photo of her as of a few minutes ago seemed to be from another pornographic site of her, perhaps the one found on, http://www.celebritiesnews.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Crissy_Moran.jpg, would be a more fair, and accurate representations of her particularly in light of her conversion and attempts to reform/shed her image as a former pornographic actress. Couldn't find the license or upload it so was unable to edit the photo myself, so I just deleted it to put it into the changelog. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.174.97.34 (talk) 11:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Site edit

I hate to rain on anyone's parade, but The Offical Site of Chrissy Moran, [1] seems to indicate this is still the way Ms Moran is making her bread. Whatever. Watchout you might be being conned. User:Kazuba 03 Dec 2006

Her blog indicates that she's been trying to figure out what to do with the material because she was under a contract for two more years: "I have cancelled all my photoshoots for the future but I still have a dilemma. I have an adult website which I am in a contract with I believe for another two years. It is very popular and earns me the majority of my income." http://blog.my space.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=103151448&blogID=161404091&Mytoken=E932F2F5-6078-4B0F-A4A6C55C57819FED53893470 She followed up, "My website is still up for now and I have yet to discuss these things with my webmasters. I am not sure what will happen in that respect. I am looking for legal counseling and any help I can get. It will be gone soon enough though." http://blog.my space.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=103151448&blogID=176971194&Mytoken=E932F2F5-6078-4B0F-A4A6C55C57819FED53893470 Zz414 03:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Blogs are not reliable sources. I'm removing these claims until they can be sourced. Valrith 23:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Where else are you going to find sources about one's conversion to Christianity? Also, her MySpace page is her actual Web page, and it's not a "blog" that does not verify the claim. This Talk page links to several of her statements on her personal page about her conversion. Where else would you expect to find these claims? Most of the other information on this page also isn't sourced, but for some reason the only statements have multiple sources are being removed by you. Is her personal, verified MySpace page insufficient? Is the reliable blog sourced by the reputable and widespread organization XXXChurch.com insufficient? What if I cited the page without the stigma of "blog" at the top? What about an interview with her on Jason Harper as "Pastor and the Porn Star"? How many more sources do you want? Do you dispute their accuracy? Zz414 00:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
The sources seem to be fine for me and by WP:V. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 01:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
The best reference would be an AVN article or a notice placed on Moran's website (the real website, not the MySpace cruft). The XXXChurch page is ok, I suppose, and the interview is considerably better than anything else, but fails WP's stipulations about rich media. Otherwise, you're correct that virtually nothing here is properly sourced. So I've removed everything that falls into that category and prodded the article for lack of notability. Valrith 21:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'm no sure Why her short autobiography which is published on a blog can't be a valid reference. Anyhow, all this will probably go away. --moyogo 23:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
This is unbelieveable. First you expect the industry she shunned to be the best place for a trumpet for her new biographical data. Then you actually concede that the Web information posted is acceptable. Then, you go ahead and throw out the baby with the bathwater, disposing of much material that had been verified and sourced in the many months this page has existed. Finally, you make the recommendation to remove this page only after you concede that maybe it's got enough source material anyway, and even though it was recommended for removal for these precise reasons just 6 months ago and the result was Keep. I don't know why you've got a vendetta against this page, but try to keep consistent in your arguments. Zz414 00:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

That link: http://www.chrissymoran.com is an affiliate link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.107.8 (talk) 23:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hustler's Relevance edit

Why is it relevant that she is featured in this month's Hustler magazine? It's not like it's the first time she is featured in a magazine [2]. Either remove or keep and add similar info, no? Or is there a story behind the timing of this? --moyogo 23:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't see the relevance of this. I'd remove it. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 05:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Prod edit

Not only has this page been approved just 6 months ago as notable, but also you've unilaterally removed content and placed a notice at the top without going through the usual channels of "citation needed." Please stop the vendetta against this page! Zz414 05:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Incorrect. According to WP:CITE#Tagging unsourced material, all uncited information is to be removed on sight from biographical articles. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 16:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ethnicity edit

Crissy is Hispanic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daskunt (talkcontribs) 12:40, December 23, 2006

Rhetoric edit

The language in this article is poor. Upon finding this site while browsing the wiki, I could hardly understand what it was about (the resources were handy though). I don't understand who Darren Hayman is or why I was suddenly given his name instead of more information about the subject of this entry. "Major magazines like Hustler Magazine?" I honestly don't know why I was given that stranded bit of information either. My apologies to you, tireless wiki contributors. I'm sure I don't understand the difficult tasks you undertake while casual users like me reap the benefits, but I just think you could use some third-party feedback. Best wishes. Iangerg 06:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree, this article sucks. The mention of Hustler is included to show that the person is notable and should be on Wikipedia. — Wackymacs 09:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
I also agree. Did some cleaning up + removed a reference to some pop artist being derogatory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.159.198.183 (talk) 03:27, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crissy Moran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply