Talk:Crich

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Derbyshire Low‑importance

The article on Crich is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article has a map
	This article has an infobox
	This article has statistical information included

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bluegoblin 7 21:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion of Roman occupation

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An edit which has been removed read as follows: Known as "Lutadarum", Crich was a source of lead and silver in Roman times, being listed in the seventh century Ravenna Cosmogeny.

This information was obtained on the website http://www.roman-britain.org/places/lutudarum.htm Roman Britain.org which otherwise scholarly. Crich in fact seems an unlikely source of lead and tin for all it is built on a limestone outcrop. Anton Shone has recently published a well-referenced paper on the possible location of Lutudarm: "Origins and History of Wirksworth: Lutudarum and the Peak District before the Norman Conquest" http://www.conferencesdirect.co.uk/clacton/Lutudarum.pdf Chevin (talk) 09:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719172219/http://www.crichweb.co.uk/ to http://www.crichweb.co.uk/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719172219/http://www.crichweb.co.uk/ to http://www.crichweb.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic