Talk:Creep (2014 film)/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • " independent found footage psychological horror " is a WP:SEAOFBLUE.   Done
  • Brice mentioned three times in the opening sentence, re-word to avoid repetition.   Done
  • "an ad" -> "advertisement" and for what?   Done
  • Lead is slim, could use some commentary about the reception etc.   Done
  • No mention throughout of any budget information?   Not sure
  • "ad for a gig" not encyclopedic in tone.   Done
  • "Josef states to have an" Josef states that he has....   Done
  • "Aarons concerns" Aaron's.   Done
  • "stating the mask was a gift " probably "claiming" rather than repeat "state" again.   Done
  • "a drink of whiskey" drink of is redundant.   Done
  • " she was into " not encyclopedic tone.  Done
  • "leave but " leave once again but.   Done
  • "his keys Aaron hears " comma after keys.   Done
  • "that Josef regained consciousness" has regained.   Done
  • " he knows of the truth" -> "he knows the truth about...?"   Done
  • "as he knows nothing about Josef" well he knows where he lives....!!   Done
  • "In the final movie, " On the final DVD?   Done
  • " wouldn't " avoid contractions.   Done
  • " South by Southwest Film Festival " just "South by Southwest" linked and "film festival" after.   Done
  • "March 8, 2014 and " comma after 2014.   Done
  • "on April 5, 2016 from" likewise after 2016.   Done
  • "but that "Despite " sentence case within the quote.   Done
  • (Same for "states, "A smart" above).   Done
  • " at South by Southwest, Duplass" no need to relink the festival.   Done
  • Sequel section needs some work, it was, after all, released in 2017.   Done
  • Avoid SHOUTING in the ref titles.

That's all I have on a first pass, so it's on hold. Incidentally, I saw and enjoyed this movie a year or so back. So it was really nice to read more about it. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

If I don't receive any feedback from my comments by 12 April, I will fail the nomination. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 21:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Happy to allow time as long as I know you're getting to it! Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 13:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hey ReaderofthePack, hope you're well. Do you think you'll be getting to this soon? Cheers, The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 07:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • With the budget, I can't find anything definite - pretty much everything just describes it as "low budget" or "microbudget". ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 23:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • With the capitalizations in the sourcing, I'm a little uncertain about changing the capitalization since that is how the source itself styled the title - the other thing is that this is also one of the way the title is styled (I added a note about this in the lead).
As far as the sequel section goes, what other information should I add? I can add some about the reception, but anything else? ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 23:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
This is all good, and I'm happy to promote now. Good work. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 10:13, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply