Talk:Creegbrawse

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

It's polite to talk about reversions on the discussion page, but I realise that not everyone is polite. While I won't Start a revert war about the pointless and petty inclusion of 'England' in this type of article, I will revert unnecessary edits that make articles less readable. Bretonbanquet 16:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's also polite not to disguise POV edits with a dishonest edit summary. There are now probably several hundred thousand words of discussion on the edits in question, if you want my edit summary here it is: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography, Talk:England and Talk:Cornwall (archives). Joe D (t) 17:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

You may well consider it dishonest, but then you would do. Anyone who just has a differing opinion to yours would appear to be dishonest. And it was a POV edit, was it? Right, and yours isn't. I've read all that discussion, and it doesn't appear to conclude anything. Don't worry, I won't try and interrupt your POV-pushing editing any more - just go ahead and change what you want. Wikipedia dips a little further. Bretonbanquet 17:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

the straw poll at the link above concluded that, whilst there were many different opinions and ideas about the best way to describe uk geography, the majority of editors wanted to see the home nation included in some form,(some with the addition of UK and some without). The use of Uk alone was a minority view. take careMammal4 17:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I did notice that - the views of the minority, i.e. those offended by the inclusion of 'England' were listened to, I realise that. But the majority being what it is, get their way, and those who are offended get offended. Nothing new there. That's why I shan't be wasting everyone's time with a revert war - I understand the way it works. But I reserve the right to be fully offended. I'd be quite happy to see this article deleted - there are probably grounds for it anyway. Care always taken. Bretonbanquet 18:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic