Talk:Cramlington Cramcraft
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Northumberland may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
editBAPC 165 is listed as a Cramlington Primary #2 and BAPC 168 is listed as a Cramcraft Primary #C.A.3 (although the BAPC number was cancelled and re-allocated and another Cramcraft Primary was BAPC 268 which may be the same glider.) Is the Cramlington Primary and the Cramcraft Primary the same glider as the Cramlington Cramcraft ? MilborneOne (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Think so. Ellison does not use the name Primary but says it was a primary glider, so Cramlington Primary and Cramcraft Primary are descriptions by type, not unusual (e.g. Manuel VI Primary, EoN Type 7 Primary). He suggests only 3 of what he calls Cramlington Cramcraft 1 were made and 2 recorded: BGA 165/cn.2 and BGA 168/cn.3, the latter rebuilt as BGA 268.
- I was slightly puzzled by the number in Cramcraft 1 (King William at the time not William I}; implies a Cramcraft II but nothing in Flight or Sailplane and Glider etc, though there was much talk of newer machines and some photographically recorded serious modifications (as in the S&G "Latest Camcraft"). Maybe BGA 268 got renumbered, or maybe it was just wishful thinking.TSRL (talk) 22:12, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for that perhaps we have to presume "II" was just a good idea but the third machine look a likely candidate after re-build, perhaps we just leave it as a mystery. MilborneOne (talk) 11:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Cramlington Cramcraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930180313/http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpages/Sailplane%20%26%20Glider%201930%20-%201955/Volume%202%20No.%201%20Jul%2017%201931.pdf to http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpages/Sailplane%20%26%20Glider%201930%20-%201955/Volume%202%20No.%201%20Jul%2017%201931.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930180539/http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpages/Sailplane%20%26%20Glider%201930%20-%201955/Volume%201%20No.%205%20Oct%203%201930.pdf to http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpages/Sailplane%20%26%20Glider%201930%20-%201955/Volume%201%20No.%205%20Oct%203%201930.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930180613/http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpages/Sailplane%20%26%20Glider%201930%20-%201955/Volume%201%20No.%207%20Oct%2017%201930.pdf to http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpages/Sailplane%20%26%20Glider%201930%20-%201955/Volume%201%20No.%207%20Oct%2017%201930.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930180613/http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpages/Sailplane%20%26%20Glider%201930%20-%201955/Volume%201%20No.%207%20Oct%2017%201930.pdf to http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpages/Sailplane%20%26%20Glider%201930%20-%201955/Volume%201%20No.%207%20Oct%2017%201930.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)