Talk:Crack the Skye

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Anticipation edit

Yeah, I'm excited about this album. But reading the plot synopsis, all I can really say is... "WHAT?!" Kingoomieiii (talk) 04:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

should be a good album cant wait till it comes out (Seth4000 (talk) 12:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)) Seth4000Reply

youtube edit

It's been out for a few days now, and still no videos of the tracks on youtube? Is the record label/youtube suppressing the uploading of them or has no one uploaded any yet? Zaruyache (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC).Reply

im not sure... ive seen one upload of "oblivion" but thats pretty much all i can find. anyway. i bought the album... its VERY good (in my opinion). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.180.37 (talk) 01:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Critical Reception edit

The critical reception section omits any negative responses. Somebody should edit in some less partisan commentary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.132.31 (talk) 05:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sputnikmusic gave it a low score of 2. [1] FireCrystal (talk) 05:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

That was such a BS review. If you wanta partisan opinion, don't include sputnkimusic's review. That review was completely biased from the start —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.200.153 (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, if you omit the only negative review you will in fact have an artificially partisan opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.248.63 (talk) 19:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Sputnik Music review is completely worthless it's as relevant as posting an amazon.com review, it's less relevant than a blog review it's just garbage user generated content. I understand that some idiots may feel that negative reviews are needed to balance out positive ones but that is in no way encyclopedic and including a trash review like that does more to hurt this article than not including criticisms. I'm sick and tired of seeing these shit sputnik music reviews posted on wikipedia and I certainly believe it should be removed from this article as well as all others as it is not notable at all.

Professional reviews edit

metacritic.com Cannibaloki 19:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Crack the Skye at Rock Sound Cannibaloki 06:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crack the Skye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Crack the Skye. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply