This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Motion for article deletion - Subject is not notable and article (in current form) appears to be promotionedit
Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The subject of this article meets none of the criteria for notability by WP:NPROF, and frankly its existence is puzzling. Everything is well-formatted, but the actual contents of the article suggest promotion/self-promotion (WP:SOAP, obviously).
I'd be interested in an expert opinion here.
Just to detail my case:
The cited award, "2021 North American Society for the Sociology of Sport Outstanding Book Award", is clearly not prestigious by WP:NPROF standards.
The selected publications, Sport for development and peace: A public sociology perspective and Changing on the fly: hockey through the voices of South Asian Canadians, are not notable.
The career section really doesn't list anything particularly notable by WP:N, and is more in the vein of promotion.
I think these three points indicate there's really no justification for the existence of this article. It is bizarre it exists in such a polished form. Howard1738 (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
For those interested, I will copy what I wrote on my talk page here: While I did write the article in 2020, it lists three in-depth news articles about Szto from reputable sources such as the Globe and Mail and Sports Illustrated. I probably should've been more specific in my description. While I am biased since I wrote this, these do seem to satisfy GNG. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
WP:NACADEMIC lists 8 criteria for notability for academics. While not meant to be directed as an insult, the subject of the article clearly does not meet any of these. Therefore, the subject cannot be considered a notable academic.
Is the subject notable outside of academia? I think one could abuse WP:N standards and force a case for why the answer to that could be "yes", citing a few random local news publications (2/3 of the articles used to support this article's existence do just that), but the success of such an attempt would largely fall on the reputation/establishment of the editor.
I think it's pretty safe to say the subject of this article is not notable inside or outside of academia. (again, not intended to be an insult)
The article comes off as promotional in nature. There are no notable contributions, achievements, etc. (by WP standards) within this article which support its existence. There are, however, links to selected publications and a career summary more fit for their academic's university Faculty page. Howard1738 (talk) 16:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hey Howard, no offence taken! I’m totally open to conversation and I don’t WP:OWN the article anyways. I’m just a bit confused by what you mean. If she has three reliable and independent sources about her, then she typically passes GNG. I wouldn’t say Globe and Mail and SI are random local news sources. I get why she might not pass N:PROF but saying she is not notable outside of academia is a bit of a stretch. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 16:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
