Talk:Court show

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Metropolitan90 in topic Organization of the article

List of Judge shows

edit

I wasn't sure how to organize the list, so I settled on chronological order. If a show had more than one run, I sorted it by the start of its most recent run. CaptPicard (talk) 16:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Judge Rinder

edit

I note that popular court shows such as the UK's Judge Rinder are not mentioned in this article. If this is an exclusively american article then perhaps the title should reflect that, since this is a global encyclopaedia USA only articles ought to be identified. Alternatively the article could be overhauled to give balanced representation to worldwide court shows. Just a suggestion :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.70.13 (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

You make a good point. I am the primary editor of this article and I was simply not aware of Judge Rinder. To be fair, this judge's court show only just came out a month ago. AmericanDad86 (talk) 17:22, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

IP, I'm seeing articles on the early success of the Judge Rinder court show you mentioned starting to pop up online so I've added it into the article with the source. AmericanDad86 (talk) 15:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Court show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Court show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Court show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Organization of the article

edit

It seems to me that the primary distinction among the various shows is as follows: 1. Some of these shows are scripted with the litigants being played by actors. 2. Other shows are real-life arbitrations, where the litigants are the real people who have the dispute, the presenter of the case actually renders an award between them, and the award is paid by the producers of the show to the winning litigant.

Yet both Science Court, an animated, scripted educational show in which fictional characters presented scientific principles in the setting of a lawsuit, and Judge Wapner's Animal Court, in which a real-life retired judge rendered arbitration decisions for real-life litigants, are listed in the same section of the article, "List of present-day nontraditional court shows". This seems to be less than helpful.

Can we find a better way to organize the article than what we have now? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply