Talk:Council of Nablus

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 16, 2008, January 16, 2009, and January 16, 2010.

A fact from Council of Nablus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Council of Nablus, held in the crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem in 1120, established punishments for adultery, bigamy, homosexuality, and sexual relations with Muslims?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/March.

Wikipedia

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages: Crusades Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

Full Text edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Is it possible to link to the full text? I don't know if the Vatican or others have digitized it... anyone interested in looking into it? Jouster 13:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I couldn't find it online...well, actually, the full text is in that Speculum article, but not everybody will be able to access that. Should we link to it anyway? Adam Bishop 16:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

No link to the full text, but I've now summarized the canons more fully. They are pretty short so sometimes it feels like I might as well have just translated them directly...but I don't think this is the appropriate place to do that, so I hope this is a good compromise. Adam Bishop 04:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pagan edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is the Pagan who signed this document as chancellor the same as the Pagan who was butler? Srnec 06:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oops, I meant to answer this like four years ago...no, they're not the same guy. Adam Bishop (talk) 09:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic