Talk:Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 November 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I think specially referring to private and christian schools is not NPOV. Vedant lath 13:55, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Um.. since it is a fact, well documented, I mean, I haven't heard of any public CISCE school, I think its actually just a bit of interesting info. Kaushik twin 04:55, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- indent your comments. there are many non-christian and govt. schools affiliated to CISCE in rourkela. so it is clearly not NPOV. Vedant lath 21:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
qualification of teachers edit
Qualification of teachers to teach in XI and XII is not mentioned anywhere. If someone is teaching upto X for ten years , with B.Sc.(Hons) - will he/she be considered to be eligible to teach in XI/XII ? 219.65.187.11 11:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
if we are doing in isc then what its more value for ous.
Copyright problem removed edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://cisce.azurewebsites.net/council.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 23:24, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- @Worldbruce:..then better make it empty rather than some other stuff..The herald 03:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- @The Herald: Sorry, I don't understand your comment. Do you mean I should have taken / should take some alternative or additional action? I've gone ahead and blanked four additional paragraphs, inserted by a different editor than the one the copyright violation notice refered to, that are word-for-word the same as text on a different website, http://www.podareducation.org/school/nerulicse/icseboard. Previously I took no action on those because I can't tell whether they were copied from that website or copied to that website from Wikipedia, and I see nothing troublesome about the other activities of the editor who inserted them.Worldbruce (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2014 (UTC)