Talk:Costa Rica national football team

Latest comment: 6 months ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

Neutrality debate edit

Somebody challenged the neutrality of this article however they did not bother on saying why, so...I guess I'll answer to what "I think" they are objecting to.

I think that the paragraphs stating what went on in the game is much more useful than just the results.

We all know the score, but in time people will forget the emotion, the points of view and the back-and-forth of the game.

Wikipedia gives the world an oportunity to record these details, that are normally lost in a dictionary or encyclopedia.

Exp.

France 1998

Final Brazil 0 - 3 France

...That may be enough, but you leave out that, all bets were on Brazil, that Zidane after recieving a red card in the first game and being almost unseen in the Cup, came to become Frances hero by scoring the first two goals, also that both goals were headers, one even going under Roberto Carlos legs, also that Ronaldo was expected to be the hero but he was under so much pressure that the day of the game he had some convulsions, and finally that Petit made the last goal in a great dash against defenders...See! All that would be lost if we just limited ourselves to 3-0!

I think that I am fair with both teams, and don't put down the opponent. It is also a "Costa Rica" page, and I would imagine that if the same thing existed on a Sweden, Scotland or Brazil page, it would go along the same lines, though it could be seen though other eyes.

I think it's a valuable addition and if others, that know thier football history well, would do the same to thier own soccer teams pages, we could have a very complete archive of games, and not just the scores...Manuzel 04:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


Performance in 2006 World Cup edit

Maybe the section on the performance in 2006 World Cup, with its match-bay-match description, is too much. I would like to discuss it in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/National teams.--Panairjdde 17:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Team Colors edit

The uniform is obviously wrong. Not only the first one should be red, they have never used that gray/black variation shown in the wikipedia. Thanks.

Of course it´s wrong. It was right before, somebody just messed with the colors. We just need someone to put it back in order--Manuzel 12:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


the only Central American team to win at least one World Cup game. edit

No way. Romania was defeated by Cuba in 1938 World Cup. Link: http://fifa.com/worldcup/archive/edition=5/results/matches/match=1157/report.html Digodf 23:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cuba is in the caribbean dumbassGethomas3 01:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

And the Caribbean is part of Central America, dumbass. Digodf 23:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

no it is no jackass. Learn geografia Ok cuba was the 1st to make it to a world cup and it said (Cuba Was The First Country In The CARRIBEAN To Make It To The World Cup. So You're Right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cokepepsi (talkcontribs) 00:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gethomas3 and Digodf, please Assume good faith and stop with the insults. As for the answer, the Caribbean can be part of Central America depending in what country someone lives so sop calling people dumbasses. Azuran 02:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Hi I also question this "fact": "Costa Rica was the first (and so far the only) Central American football team to win a game at a FIFA World Cup tournament." The Wiki page for Mexico at the World Cup says Mexico beat Czechoslovakia 3-1 in 1962, and also won games at WC 1970 and 1986. Costa Rica didn't qualify for a World Cup until 1990. Mexico is surely Central America?

So how do you guys like what i did to the page? edit

cool huh? No — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.54.236 (talk) 06:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Costa Rica football association.png edit

The image Image:Costa Rica football association.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Medford gone from Coaching job. edit

http://www.nacion.com/ln_ee/2008/junio/27/deportes1597691.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.129.150 (talk) 03:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Players abroad table ordered alphabetically edit

I just took the time to order the Players Abroad table alphabetically to list the players by their last name. Previously the players were listed by their position on the field but I think this way it's easier to read thru the names and find the player that interests you. If anyone feels any different and doesn't like the new list order feel free to revert to the old version.--190.10.76.226 (talk) 20:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Date update edit

Can someone update the players statistics to the game vs. El Salvador of 1st April 2009?

It has to be updated even the data relative to the player with N°3 jersey, Josè Fernandez according to FIFA official Match Report.

Thanks

Gold Cup results edit

... are missing. Instead, the Copa Centroamericana, much less important, is shown.--Severino (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Why are they called "Los Ticos"? edit

I noticed that the reason for the nickname "Los Ticos" for this team is given nowhere in this article. I'd suggest that it would be good if someone could add something on that... --IJBall (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Biggest win and First International edit

So their biggest win and their first match are on the same day, something about that doesn't seem right — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalejade (talkcontribs) 21:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

And if you read the information it's evidently not a mistake...Correctron (talk) 03:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Scratch that. The first is legit. Going to go look for the other one. Correctron (talk) 04:00, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hawaiifive0 changed it July 2, 2014. No one touched it. That biggest win is apparently a lie. Correctron (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

I would suggest that pureto Rico flag is wrong pls change it...... it is in biggest victory side 37.231.92.79 (talk) 18:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The flag used is correct. The Puerto Rico national team used the United States flag until the adoption of the current flag in 1952. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Afghanistan national football team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Afghanistan national football team which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)Reply