Talk:Cosoryx
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 14 December 2020
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cosoryx article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 14 December 2020 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 14:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Cosoryx → Cosoryx furcatus – Perhaps this comes from a place of ignorance, but I believe the title should be Cosoryx furcatus instead of just Cosoryx, since the article refers to a specific species and not the genus as a whole. Slippery Shaman (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- support teh article is about the species not the genus. blindlynx (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - monotypic genera are always covered at the genus level (unless there is another article with the same name). See:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per FunkMonk. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.