Talk:Correlation correction for attenuation

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles

Statistics Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Question edit

is it better to use your TCG offset to compensate for material and standard compatibility or material attenuation correction to equalize the difference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.235.75.2 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 7 February 2007 207.235.75.2

Merge discussion edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The suggestion is to merge Correction for attenuation and Disattenuation as these are essentially the same topics. I envisage using Correction for attenuation for the title, but with the main version of text taken from Disattenuation. Comments? Melcombe (talk) 16:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merger done, but still many problems. Melcombe (talk) 11:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

the disattenuated correlation edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to the formula in the article, it seems that the absolute value of disattenuated correlation would end up greater than 1. Am I right? 203.98.92.232 (talk) 06:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

This article needs attention edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The first paragraph states:

" The correlation between two sets of parameters [...]"

However, in a frequentist framework, parameters do not have a distribution (hence, they have no correlation). This occurs in other places in the article and needs some tidying up.

Tal Galili (talk) 21:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic