Talk:Correctiv

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 2A01:C22:356E:A700:38B3:7C90:5EDD:C9B6 in topic Article is not neutral
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Correctiv. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article is not neutral

edit

Despite depending on establishment foundations and corporations for most of its funding, Correctiv claims to be "nonprofit, independent and investigative".

This sentence is neither provable nor disprovable (also, what ist the definition of an establishment foundations?). Maybe the author can explain how they think that Correctiv is neither nonprofit (this is a legal status btw.), independant (do the donors have some requirements?), nor investigative?

--2A01:C22:356E:A700:38B3:7C90:5EDD:C9B6 (talk) 19:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply