Talk:Cornwallis in India

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 210.89.63.227 in topic What is a lord cornwallis
Good articleCornwallis in India has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 23, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 22, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Charles Cornwallis, during his governorship in India, refused to blame General William Medows for his performance in the 1792 Siege of Seringapatam?

Cornwallis Triumphant

edit

This is indeed a good article, and I wish I had known about it sooner. I wrote my thesis on Cornwallis in India two years ago. Don't worry: I do not aim to add my original research to this entry, but there is an article by P.J. Marshall that is relevant to Cornwallis's return after the Third Anglo-Mysore War. It explains his popularity and even celebrity upon returning to England. This article is not available online to my knowledge, but here is a link to a PDF of the scanned article I used:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9g6bLfH0geFb0J5QmZCOThNckk/edit?usp=sharing

Marshall, P.J. “Cornwallis Triumphant: War in India and the British Public in the Late Eighteenth Century.” In Freedman, Laurence and Paul Hayes and Robert O’Neill. War, Strategy, and International Politics: Essay in Honour of Sir Michael Howard, 57-74. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

That citation is Chicago style. I am putting this all out there for I am but a Gnome and do not know the ways of contributing and properly citing more substantial content. Is this article even usable? I don't know these things, but would very much like to improve this already good article by explaining, if only briefly, just how popular he was after his victory.

--StringRay (talk) 16:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the vote of confidence (I did most of the work on this). As far as I can tell from a brief scan, the Marshall piece looks like a decent source for adding more to the article. Magic♪piano 16:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I've added a paragraph to the beginning of the 'After India' section. I had a little trouble doing the reference so for some reason Marshall's name is a red link in the references section. Edit away! --StringRay (talk) 22:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Outrageously One-sided and Offensive article

edit

This article seems to have been written by a British colonial apologist using the very same language used in the oppressive exorbitant taxation laws that made India bankrupt and suffer famines and the vast impoverishment of its people. Cornwallis instituted fixed taxes based on a Zamindar's landholding with no bearing to the vagaries of weather, the working conditions of the tiller or the type of crop cultivated. The so called oppressive Zamindars paid 10/11ths of the revenue to the British Raj and kept a paltry but sizeable 1/11ths to themselves leaving nothing to the tiller. The fixed revenues created an incentive for the Zamindar to cultivate cash crops like cotton starving the populace of food crops. Such was the great "reform" of Cornwallis. I forcefully reject the use of the term reform and urge a neutral examination of this article with citations from Nobel prize winning economists such as Amartya Sen. I am appalled by the glowing language used to describe this oppressive war criminal maladministrator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indianconciencekeeper (talkcontribs) 18:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cornwallis in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

What is a lord cornwallis

edit

question anawer 210.89.63.227 (talk) 01:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply