| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article contains a translation of Corina Smith from es.wikipedia. |
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedily deleted because...
While it is true that the original article did not meet the requirements of this encyclopedia, currently she is a rising actress and a public personality, without a doubt this article should exist only observe the Spanish version of it (Corina Smith), moreover, this article was a direct translation of that article (in Spanish).
Ultimately times have changed since 2015 and there are many reliable references on it on the internet, proof of which are included in this article, and was even nominated for some awards such as the Heat Latin Music Awards.
Twitter and Instagram show their accounts as verified that is to say they consider a relevant figure.
It is more in this encyclopedia sometimes include personalities less relevant than her, or in some way equal to her in what concerns fame, such as Rosmeri Marval, Sheryl Rubio, and even his own father who is little referenced has an article (Roberto Smith Perera).
And because she does not have an article?
Just look at these articles:
There are thousands of results and references more to Corina Smith on the internet than in these previous examples. --Erickespinal26 (talk) 02:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedily deleted because... Not exactly the same, I did not even know that there was an article about her, and of course the problems were addressed, now it is a relevant figure, and reliable references were added including that of television channels and news media.
Not just social media as they said before.
So now it is written in stone, that there will no longer be an article about her.
Will they always be erased?
What a bizarre bureaucracy in this encyclopedia, that even discourage and disappointed to follow.
They did not even bother to see the new references.
They only say that it is the same, only because the same mold was used. --Erickespinal26 (talk) 02:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I need help edit
 | This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. (may 2019) |
Help, I need to improve the article.
Erickespinal26 (talk) 17:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- I see that the article variously refers to its subject as "Corina Smith", "she", "Smith", "he", "Corina", and "I". Wikipedia policy is to use the surname alone when a noun is needed, and the third-person pronoun of the correct gender when a pronoun is better. So, "Smith" and "she". Maproom (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help Maproom.
- Erickespinal26 (talk) 14:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC)