Talk:Copyright claims on Bikram Yoga
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Blacklisted Links Found on Copyright claims on Bikram Yoga
editCyberbot II has detected links on Copyright claims on Bikram Yoga which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- https://www.change.org/p/can-yoga-be-owned
- Triggered by
\bchange\.org\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:20, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Bikram Files for Rehearing Dec. 7, 2015
editIn case anyone is checking here:
- On October 8th 2015 A three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Bikram's yoga sequence of postures was not entitled to copyright protection.
- Bikram attorneys then filed for an 45 day extension of time to petition for a rehearing. This extension of time was granted.
- Filed order / unopposed motion for an extension of time to December 7, 2015 within which to file a petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. [9723826] (WL)
- On December 7th.2015 Bikram attorneys submitted his petition for a rehearing to be heard by the entire 9th Circuit. As of this date the courts decision regarding the en banc rehearing has not been returned. Sir Barkselot (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Copyright claims on Bikram Yoga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150223151026/http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20111130/lower-east-side-east-village/bikram-originator-sues-yoga-people-for-stealing-poses to http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20111130/lower-east-side-east-village/bikram-originator-sues-yoga-people-for-stealing-poses
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150223145732/http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20130103/williamsburg/yoga-people-unveils-26-plus-6-bikram-yoga-replacement to http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20130103/williamsburg/yoga-people-unveils-26-plus-6-bikram-yoga-replacement
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150322205716/http://yogatothepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Greg-Letter-Bikram-Settlement.pdf to http://yogatothepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Greg-Letter-Bikram-Settlement.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)