 | This article was nominated for deletion on January 18 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Complaint edit
This entry reads like an advert. POV cleanup or vote for deletion? 70.246.31.124 (talk) 13:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
As becomes blatantly obvious upon a cursory examination of this pages "sources", austinshoemaker, the primary author of this article, is a founder and CTO of Cooliris, a clear example of WP:COI. Eric4200 (talk) 19:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Then why don't you guys scour the web for other sources and edit the article! --58.107.4.80 (talk) 11:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Why COI? edit
The article as it stands has the coi cleanup template but doesn't appear to have any npov etc violations. WP:WHYCOI? -- samj inout 16:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Because it reads like a board room meeting at Cooliris, and was ACTUALLY WRITTEN by the company's CEO. Saying that it offers " a beautiful photo experience" is not a neutral point of view. And "building a whole new photo experience for creation, curation and consumption." just wreaks of corporate alliteration jargon. And since the discussion pages aren't meant for opinions, I don't even need to mention how the "three unique core benefits" that this article says Cooliris offers are staple features of EVERY photo app on the planet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moeburn (talk • contribs) 15:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Privacy Question edit
I read their privacy statement before installing, and I am glad I did. It looks as if the program is just a means to deliver ads amd track usage. No thanks. Too bad as it looks to be a good program otherwise.
- You gotta love a program with no uninstall options or even a mention of uninstall on their website.... Static Universe talk|edits 16:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- The program is made by the same people who previously worked under the name Direct Revenue, makers of the most intrusive malware ever, and multimillionaires. The article doesn't mention it of course. Because it's written by one of them.Justice404 (talk) 09:46, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Citation needed? Cooliris has nothing to do with Direct Revenue. 64.9.237.201 (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
CoolPreview will not work with recent Firefox versions edit
Should the article say that CoolPreview will not work with recent Firefox versions?
There is no old version you can download that will work.
EDLIS Café 17:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdRicardo (talk • contribs)