Talk:Contralateral brain

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Marci68

The "Theories" section seems to mostly be written in support of this publication: https://peerj.com/articles/7096/ —Is the Wikipedia article biased or being used to strengthen the publication linked? ( rcbarnes, 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcbarnes (talkcontribs)

Surely, this should not be the impression. Indeed, there is very little scientific literature on theories, given that the contralateral organization of the brain is such a well-known phenomenon. Possibly the opening paragraph of the "Theories" section should be made less concise (i.e. listing earlier proposals more explicitly) and the reference to https://peerj.com/articles/7096/ removed (it is cited again later). Is that what you mean? Marci68 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks for the comment: I now revised the introduction to the Contralateral brain#Theories section! Marci68 (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply