Talk:Content discovery platform
 | The contents of the Content discovery platform page were merged into Recommender system on 2 July 2024 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Content discovery platform redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertisement tag
editI have tried to make it read less like an ad though I am not sure that ad is the right word as its not clear who is being advertised but it does read like something written by a professional on the subject which may by its style alienate our readers. --SurfaceBrainz (talk) 17:20, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to replace the ad tag again you must contribute to the talk page, ie replay to me. Not contributing to the talk page while engaging in edit warring is not what one expects in a prestigious place like wikipedia. --SurfaceBrainz (talk) 17:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Removed additional promotional content (not from OP), disguised as Wikipedia:Coatrack of a technical article. Information should be added from reliable independent sources, not from self-published promotional "case studies". See also Wikipedia's policies about paid editing, COI editing and promotional spam. GermanJoe (talk) 05:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Content Discovery Platform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141117210156/http://www.publishingtechnology.com:80/2013/04/mendeley-elsevier-and-the-importance-of-content-discovery-to-academic-publishers/ to http://www.publishingtechnology.com/2013/04/mendeley-elsevier-and-the-importance-of-content-discovery-to-academic-publishers/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
General layout
editI'm finding this page confusing based on the layout and titling. Most distribution platforms now include content discovery as their main objective and content discovery platforms are more recommendation engines than platforms. I think it would make more sense to break the page summary down into Content platforms which a sections that highlight various verticals — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdWomanMan (talk • contribs) 19:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- I suggest moving this article to Content discovery, as recommendation engines are discussed in Recommender system and there's much more in-depth coverage of "content discovery" in Google Scholar, compared to "content discovery platforms", which is a marketing term for a type of software without obvious differences from recommendation engines. PaulT2022 (talk) 16:18, 6 September 2022 (UTC)