Talk:Constitutions of Clarendon

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Katiehawks in topic Drafting

Drafting edit

I simply can't understand "Bishops were in agreement over the articles until the Pope disapproved and then Becket repudiated his arguments." Whose arguments did Becket repudiate, Henry's or the Pope's? And what were the "articles"? Deipnosophista (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

lol. Yeah! What 'Deip', says. That's why I came here.

(talk) 02:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC))Reply

Similarly 'predecessor law'. This may be a technical term I've not come across, but I don't remember reading it in Hudson! 'Its predecessor' or something? Katiehawks (talk) 22:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Constitutions of Clarendon Project edit

Hi, as part of my MA course we are updating Wikipedia pages on topics surrounding the issue of Clerical Exemption. As such, I will be working on considerably updating this page and connected pages. Rtmisst (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply