Talk:Constitution of Kazakhstan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comments edit

I am told that any criticisms of the constitution or its effectiveness do not belong here. This is ridiculous, it is far more important than what the document actually says. For instance see this along with other info on the US constitution page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Constitution#Criticisms

Or check any of the various French constitutions from the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen onward and their wiki pages. You dictatorial apologists never fail to astonish me. Check out the government of Kazakhstan page. You could show it to a child and what they would get from it is that Kazakhstan is a representative democracy with a strong balance of powers. This is a disgrace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.1.250.14 (talk) 23:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitution of Kazakhstan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply