Talk:Conor Woodman
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Scam City edit
Okay. This article is subject to the world's slowest edit war, and it needs to stop. The issue is the following content:
In May, 2014, the National Geographic Channel issued a statement regarding the Amsterdam edition of Scam City (Series 2, Episode 4), admitting that "[m]any of the incidences presented as reality were in fact staged, albeit after extensive research by the production company." [1] On his Twitter account, Woodman referred to the actors as 'convicted criminals.'
This information is covered under Scam City and, apart from the unsourced quote from Woodman's Twitter account, is far more applicable to Scam City than it is to Woodman. I feel that it should be left to the Scam City article. I've deleted it from Conor Woodman, but I'm open to conversation - does anyone have a compelling reason why it ought to be kept in as opposed to left to Scam City? NekoKatsun (talk) 18:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ "'Scam City' Amsterdam edition used staged scenes, NatGeo admits". DutchAmsterdam. 2 June 2014. Retrieved 3 June 2014.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Conor Woodman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140620052127/http://www.broadcastdigitalawards.co.uk/1008884 to http://www.broadcastdigitalawards.co.uk/1008884/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
