Talk:Connector (road)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eddiemontoya. Peer reviewers: Juliajacobo15.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Special and supplemental edit
Just to clarify, connector routes can be both "special" and "supplemental". Michigan has its CONN M-44, but it also has non-signposted connectors whose numbers are unrelated to the routes that they connect (see http://www.michiganhighways.org/other/unsigned.html#Connectors). Nebraska's are the same, just with a special numbering scheme. Ohio also has connectors, non-signposted routes with a suffix of "C" (see the straight-line diagrams or List of State Routes in Ohio). Therefore, they vary by state in their labels, but still perform the same function. Mapsax (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're right. I just removed the part that suggested that Nebraska's are special routes because I couldn't think of how best to phrase what you've just said. On that list of Nebraska link/etc routes, I didn't see any that were technically "special routes" because the numbering scheme is different. Ohio's connectors seem to actually be special routes since they add the "C" like an alternate route would add an "A", but since they are unsigned, I wouldn't imagine them being very important, though might be worth a mention or two. --Triadian (talk) 00:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)