Talk:Congregation of Holy Cross

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Congregation of Holy Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313165007/http://cscfrs-si.org/schools.htm to http://cscfrs-si.org/schools.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313165007/http://cscfrs-si.org/schools.htm to http://cscfrs-si.org/schools.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313165007/http://cscfrs-si.org/schools.htm to http://cscfrs-si.org/schools.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313165007/http://cscfrs-si.org/schools.htm to http://cscfrs-si.org/schools.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120831143609/http://www.congregaciondesantacruz.cl/ to http://www.congregaciondesantacruz.cl/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110912052329/http://www.brothersofholycross.com/ghanawebsite/ to http://www.brothersofholycross.com/ghanawebsite/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Congregation of Holy Cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100905052044/http://www.holycross-sw.org/index.html to http://www.holycross-sw.org/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

"CatholicMom.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CatholicMom.com. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 7#CatholicMom.com until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 10:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

..."rites" instead of "rights"?

Change of meaning in the introduction? 2603:8001:2600:E50A:602E:EC6B:FB2D:E0DF (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by your question, but "pontifical right" is correct in the intro. "Right" refers to the kind of independence and oversight the organization has rather than to the form of religious ceremonies they use, "rites". Jahaza (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)