Talk:Conformal coating
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Conformal coating article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Conformal film page were merged into Conformal coating on April 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Comparison with potting
editBoth this article and the one on potting say that it is normal to use conformal coating rather than potting, but no reasons are given. I assume that there are still circumstances where potting would be preferred. It would be nice if someone could add a section on the comparative advantages and disadvantages of conformal coating vs. potting. It's not a subject I know about, but it would be a useful addition to the article if there is someone who could do it.. 86.16.3.237 (talk) 18:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Critique on sources used
editThis article cites almost entirely from the website of two organizations: electrolube.com and conformalcoating.co.uk. More independent and scientific review papers are welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.215.11.62 (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Too Promotional
editThe article compares the subject with other methods of coating, which could possibly be promotional. TorlianMapping (talk) 16:26, 9 August 2024 (UTC)