Talk:Confederate Memorial (Romney, West Virginia)/GA1

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Neutralhomer (talk · contribs) 11:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    Good prose, well-written, no copy-vios.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Didn't see any MOS issues.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    Sources, citiations, notes and bibliography are all listed clearly.
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    Sources are good, no issues.
    C. No original research:  
    No OR seen.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Topic dicussed in good detail.
    B. Focused:  
    Topic remains focused, no unnecessary detail on any one part.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Neutral and unbiased.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    No edit-wars or content disputes.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    Images are either of own work or public domain, FURs and copyright status templates are given on each.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
    Images are relevant and have appropriate captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Good article all around, very well done. - NeutralhomerTalk • 11:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply