Talk:Coney Island/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Stalinsunnykvj (talk · contribs) 13:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Noted Points

• This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, then an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail or consider shrinking it by merging short sections and giving appropriate Headings.
  • I don't think that would be necessary at this time. The longest section, the History section, is only about half of the total prose content. In regards to other summary pages, we have Coney Island in popular culture. The previous page at Transportation to Coney Island was redirected per Articles for Deletion because that is not a notable topic. epicgenius (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
• Avoid including galleries in articles, as per Wikipedia:Galleries. Common solutions to this problem include moving the gallery to wikicommons or integrating images with the text.
• The Article Has Lint Errors.
  • I didn't detect any. epicgenius (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
• Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.?
  • Thanks for the comment. What links are you thinking of? I think there are sufficient links so it doesn't violate Wikipedia:Overlinking. epicgenius (talk) 02:42, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.

Images

• File:ConeyIslandAerial.jpg has no Source.
• Should Consider Remove/Replace Low Quality Images. (File:LincolnHS.jpg,File:MTA Coney Is Stillwell 03.jpg)

Call for another reviewer or subject expert to provide a second opinion. Stalin Sunny ^Talk2Me 13:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

@Stalinsunnykvj: Thanks for the comments, I just saw this review. These points don't seem to address any specific GA criteria, however (though I have removed the problematic images and the gallery). Do you want to close this so that this can go in line for a review? epicgenius (talk) 18:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Closing

Per discussion on WT:GAN and because of a likely impending split in the article, this nomination/review is being closed/withdrawn. Once matters with the article are settled, a new nomination can be made. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)