Talk:Concubinatus

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it is the other way around, they copied from Wikipedia (see oldid of Marriage in ancient Rome $ Concubinage). I have only made split, reviewed it (it was not written very well), and created a new page. --Grufo (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

You're correct of course. My apologies, I've removed the tag. --John B123 (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. --Grufo (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

NPOV

This revert is inappropriate. There are several reliable sources that indicate that the concubinage sometimes also referred to relationships between free and slaves in the Roman context. If you feel the sources are not reliable enough, we can take them to WP:RS. WP:NPOV requires us to carefully state what reliable sources say. If the source contradicts other sources, then we attribute the viewpoint and make note of the contradiction.VR _talk 20:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

See Talk:Contubernium § NPOV. --Grufo (talk) 22:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Source missing, contrast with other voice

Despite traditional Roman aversion against polygamy and the fact that according to the Roman law a man could not have a concubine while he had a wife -----> where is the source for this? The voice [[1]] clearly contradict this, with sources. --DenkoSekka (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

@DenkoSekka: I haven't checked the other page, but here it is. --Grufo (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)