Talk:Concubinage (law)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Grufo in topic "Revival"

Notability edit

Every topic on wikipedia should be WP:NOTABLE, which requires multiple RS that address "the topic directly and in detail". What are these RS that address the topic directly and in detail? Dictionary entries[1][2][3] seem like a trivial mention and therefore wouldn't count.VR talk 20:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

There are links to entire civil codes reflecting the term in French and Philippine law. I've also seen passing mentions to concubinage laws in Brazil and Mexico, but I need to research it. Notability just requires that there is clear evidence of the use of the term out there. But yes, it's definitely still stubby. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Revival" edit

Translating a current law from Latin into a modern language is not “a revival”, it is simply a translation. Most legal systems of Europe were translated from Latin to modern languages about in the same period. Concubinage laws have been present throughout the entire Middle Age. --Grufo (talk) 20:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply