Talk:Compound chocolate

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

List of products

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The list of products containing compound chocolate is unsourced and incomplete. An exhaustive list of products would be very long and have to take region into account, as products vary by country. I suggest this is not really feasible to maintain, and that we remove the section from the article. Ibadibam (talk) 21:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. There's just no way to ever make a verifiable, maintainable, comprehensive list. Will remove it promptly. oknazevad (talk) 00:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Verifiable" is easy, but "maintainable" is difficult, and "comprehensive" is impossible. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Possible ambiguity

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Chocolatey redirected to here, but there is also a program with the same name. If someone creates an article about it (if it does not exist already) a clarification might be necessary in the beginning of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.111.29.185 (talk) 12:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Done There's actually already an article on it. I've added the hatnote. Good catch. Ibadibam (talk) 19:53, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic