 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 July 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
- Comment - I'm new to Wikipedia and the articles on Complete Vocal Institute and Complete Vocal Technique are the first I have written/edited. Even though singing technique is an international subject I also did them in Danish because the Institute lies in Copenhagen. The articles was deleted with pure majority voting without looking at the references and the facts. I hope that the english administrators are more professional.
Complete Vocal Technique are used by hundreds of singers in mainly Europe. More than a hundred singing teachers all over Europe use the technique in their teaching today. Do the math on the number of singers that are familiarly with the technique. Complete Vocal Technique is an official teaching method for the danish Ministry of Education (search for Cathrine Sadolin - founder of the Institute) and teachers from the Institute are used as part of the colloquium in the danish College system. The article on Complete Vocal Technique was started by someone unknown to me last summer. I added details on the singing technique as the originally edited article recommended and suddenly the article doesn't meet the guidelines for notability. The original Complete Vocal Institute was first rejected fairly because of lack of references - I added them and the article was accepted.
The Economist magazine noted in its november 5th 2011 issue that the month-on-month article growth on Wikipedia have fallen to 1%. Having used a lot of time on collecting the facts and the references for the articles, and then just have them deleted by majority vote and not based on facts, I understand why the flow of articles have fallen. Besobnb (talk) 14:36, 21 February 2012 (UTC)