Talk:Community season 4

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2604:6000:1205:C0BB:802A:89A3:F3C8:1D0E in topic Please try to be accurate in the reception section

Advanced Introduction to Finality edit

Is there evidence to support that "Advanced Introduction to Finality" is the finale? The source only says "Episode 411" but makes no mention of being episode 13. Am I missing something? Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

The production number is 411, but it'll air as the finale. Just look at the two Twitter links used for the source of the writer of the episode ([1], [2]). Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Looks good to me. I hadn't seen those two tweets earlier. Kevinbrogers (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Episode Descriptions edit

Are the episode descriptions from http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/community/listings/ the official descriptions? On the specific episode pages they state that the information is directly from NBC, but I'd rather not add them if they'll just be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.85.204 (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, those are the official episode descriptions sent out by NBC. Regardless, we just can't copy and paste that content here, per WP:COPYVIO. Content on Wikipedia has to written in your own words. Drovethrughosts (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the clarification, I was unaware of the copying issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.9.59 (talk) 21:40, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please try to be accurate in the reception section edit

Someone keeps reverting edits to describe the reception for the season as "lukewarm." Look, I know it wasn't popular among fans, but the fact is, objectively and factually, the season received generally positive critical reception. (Even scoring the same score as Season One on Metacritic) Please do not keep reverting the article to read "lukewarm", as it's not accurate. MaximumMadnessStixon (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Very good point. Even the current form is not quite accurate. How is the reception "mixed" with 69% on Metacritic ("generally favorable reviews") and 65% on Rotten Tomatoes (fresh)? With a show with less baggage, it would be something like "generally positive", or "mixed to positive". Examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_On_(1998_film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellion_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibiza_(film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1205:C0BB:802A:89A3:F3C8:1D0E (talk) 02:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply