Talk:Communist Party (Sweden)

MLF merger

I oppose the proposed merger. MLF and KFML(r) were two separate organizations. --Soman 08:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Elections 2006

In 2006, the Party contested in Nörrköping (0.5%. (http://www.val.se/val/val2010/valnatt/K/kommun/05/81/index.html)

Elections 2010

Alingsas (0.7%), Uppsala (0.3%), Kristianstad (0.3%), Lysekil (7.2% 3 Seats), Karlshamm (2.5% 1 Seat), Jönköping (0.4%), Göteborg (0.8%), Gislaved (3.4% 2 Seats), Varnamö (0.5%), Nörrköping (0.3%), Lund (0.1%), Örebrö 0.2%--85.3.182.128 (talk) 07:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)--85.3.182.128 (talk) 07:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

--85.3.182.128 (talk) 06:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Election results

I wished some one could correct the election results. There are some votes excluded from the currect chart, why it is not correct. Plus a percentage result would be appriciated. Miantonimah (talk) 11:23, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

The text goes "During the 1980s, KPML(r) achieved representation in some munipicalities". Two objections;
the first municipal representation was achieved in 1979 Lysekil;
the use of the 1977-2005 acronym will only confuse. I argue the use of the current name in texts like this. Miantonimah (talk) 12:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

It's perfectly fine to expand with more references to correct the passages on the election results. But we have to use the names used at the time (i.e. KFML(r) until 1977, KPML(r) 1977-2005). In the 1970s and 1980s just saying "the Communist Party" in a mainstream English text talking about Swedish politics would have been a reference to VPK. So trying to use other names than the ones used at the time is more confusing. --Soman (talk) 14:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Still I would appreciate a percentage result at the election box. Some one up to it? Miantonimah (talk) 11:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Electoral results 1985

Here is the results in the local election in 1985, as published in Proletären no 41/1985, pg 7: Malmö: 448 Lund: 160 Trelleborg: 371 Helsingborg: 138 Karlshamn: 1030 Varberg: 101 Jönköping: 562 Växjö: 142 Uppvidinge: 45 Gislaved: 505 Visby: 75 Norrköping: 169 Göteborg: 5874 Lerum: 160 Partille: 138 Alingsås: 105 Borås: 119 Mölndal: 325 Lysekil: 329 Uddevalla: 211 Trollhättan: 94 Vänersborg: 59 Stockholm: 693 Uppsala: 117 Gävle: 193 Sundsvall: 139 Umeå: 217 Skellefteå: 168 Miantonimah (talk) 10:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Election 2014

Here is a page who links to all the results for the party in the 2014 election: [1] Miantonimah (talk) 08:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Communist Party (Sweden). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050829222810/http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c4/04/56/62852847.pdf to http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c4/04/56/62852847.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120427162908/http://www.kommunisterna.org/en/about to http://www.kommunisterna.org/en/about/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 11 August 2017 (UTC)