Talk:Communications of the ACM

links redirect (and 2 are now isomorphic...)

Two (the first two) of the links in the "External links" section of the article both re-direct to "http://cacm.acm.org/". ((Shouldn't somthing in the article be updated?)) Mike Schwartz (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Done. Hermel (talk) 07:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

The publication looks more like a magazine than a journal....

http://portal.acm.org/toc.cfm?id=J79&coll=portal&dl=ACM&type=periodical&idx=J79&part=magazine&WantType=Magazines&title=Communications%20of%20the%20ACM&CFID=47743575&CFTOKEN=95528182

http://cacm.acm.org/
--222.64.22.104 (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

No editorial board is visible at the website http://cacm.acm.org/search?q=Editorial+board&submit.x=32&submit.y=13&site_search= --222.64.22.104 (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

It is, as the article says, both a magazine and an academic journal. The latter are peer reviewed. --Bduke (Discussion) 02:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

• This editor is an anon IP troll with a long history of challenging trivial facts in science articles. Don't waste your time andy (talk) 09:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Lisp

I see on the Lisp article that McCarthy's original paper was published in this magazine/journal. Wouldn't that be considered influential enough to warrant inclusion on this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.138.100.207 (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Codd's seminal Relational Database Normalisation paper should be listed here...

Dr. E.F. Codd (IBM) 1970 paper “A Relational Model of Data for large Shared Databanks" Communications of the ACM, June, pp. 377-387) 122.148.41.172 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC).

File:Acm communications.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Acm communications.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)