Talk:Communications Act 2003

Paved the way

I don't believe the phrase "paved the way for full-time Community Radio services in the UK" is correct. There were several community stations launched in the 1990s such as Wey Valley 102 in Hampshire and Spire FM in Wiltshire. Is a citation needed for this? Jckcip (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

A citation is needed for anything you or any other editor thinks is questionable. Feel free to add a {{Fact}} tag after the relevant sentence. Road Wizard (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Provisions of the act

please discuss changes here before applying them - thank you ChristopheT (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Communications Act 2003. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120623230407/http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org:80/en/PracticeNote.2102.html to http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/PracticeNote.2102.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090817104225/http://www.culture.gov.uk:80/what_we_do/Broadcasting/media_ownership/ to http://www.culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/Broadcasting/media_ownership/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Section 127

I am astonished at some of the prosecutions which are being made under Section 127.[1] How does this compare with the situation in the USA? I believe the American right to freedom of speech is much stronger than the British. Roberttherambler (talk) 15:47, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Communications Act 2003. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141009221620/http://www.neiladdison.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/law/malcomm.htm to http://www.neiladdison.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/law/malcomm.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

2018 Prosecution of Mark Meechan

'Despite claiming it was a joke, the court found him guilty of being "grossly offensive" on 20 March.'

This means that the *court* claimed it was a joke, which is almost certainly wrong. 77.102.94.198 (talk) 17:27, 21 March 2018 (UTC)