Talk:Commonwealth free trade

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. After two full listing periods, there are no support votes other than the nom, and one oppose. Oppose seems legitimate as well - the current article is long enough and focused on free trade, so there seems no reason to expand it; a separate article can be created if desired. (non-admin closure)  — Amakuru (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Commonwealth free trade → Economy of the Commonwealth of Nations – Expand the article to the economy of the Commonwealth.--Relisted. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC) 86.138.14.247 (talk) 01:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

• Oppose why expand this article? It's a fairly substantial article as it is. Why don't you just create a new article. -- 70.24.251.36 (talk) 08:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I think it is better to expand this article to include the freedom of movement of the factors of production within the Commonwealth, including the figures of the imports and exports of the member states. This information is related to free trade but is better described as the economy of the Commonwealth. 86.138.14.247 (talk) 02:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Almost complete lack of secondary source citations

If an objective editor were to start deleting unreferenced arguments/sentences/paragraphs in this article, there would soon be no article at all. Will return and delete more some time later. If you are knowledgeable in this area please edit and reference. Juan Riley (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Probably because there isn't really any reliable sources justifying the concept of a multilateral Commonwealth Free Trade area. The subject of improving Commonwealth trade does seem to exist, as demonstrated by the Valletta Statement on Multilateral Trade at the 2005 summit. So we should probably try to refocus the article on that (with more sources of course). Possibly move the page to "Commonwealth trade relations" or similar. Rob984 (talk) 16:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Rob984: Though I concur, there is a rather emotionally invested clique in this kind of subject that I jave learned to avoid. Juan Riley (talk) 21:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Does it really?

The recent decision of the UK to leave the European Union has brought further attention to the concept of a Commonwealth Free Trade Agreement. We can say this after only a day or afew days?-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 21:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commonwealth free trade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130105144620/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/news/190628/163075/147476/valletta_statement_on_multilateral_trade.htm to http://www.thecommonwealth.org/news/190628/163075/147476/valletta_statement_on_multilateral_trade.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024140336/http://www.acp-eu-trade.org/index.php?loc=faq%2FACP-Secretariat-FAQ.php to http://www.acp-eu-trade.org/index.php?loc=faq%2FACP-Secretariat-FAQ.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC)