Talk:Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students
 | A fact from Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- ... that it is compulsory for educational providers of international students to register with CRICOS in Australia? Source: https://www.asqa.gov.au/cricos/overview. Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA).
- ALT1:... that educational providers must register through CRICOS to legally educate and train international students in Australia? Source: https://www.asqa.gov.au/cricos/overview. Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA).
Created by BeaClaire (talk). Nominated by Carrolquadrio (talk) at 05:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC).
Hello. Thank you for submitting this article to Did You Know. Unfortunately, this article is a long way from passing criteria #1 Newness of the 5 criteria per Wikipedia:Did_you_know#Eligibility_criteria. Within the last 7 days it was not a newly made article, moved into mainspace nor designated a Good Article. Therefore, I checked if the prose in this article was expanded 5 times within the last 7 days. Before the 7 day nomination period, this article had 10kb of prose size on May 18th. To determine this, I used the Prosesize gadget in Preferences. Therefore, the article needs to have expanded to 50k of prose sometime been May24 (7 days ago) and May 31st (end of the 7 day period). However, this article is currently at 11k of prose, which is very short of the 50k requirement for this article to be five times expanded. As this is a long way from reaching a 5 times expansion, and none of the other newness criteria apply to this article, I will have to close this DYK nomination as unsuccessful.
On a sidenote, I notice that this article also has parts that are missing citations at 2001–Present, Criteria and Registration, Guideline 5: Education Agents, Fees and Charges, and Annual Registration Charge (ARC). These parts would need to be cited in order to pass Criteria #3 Within Policy. This specifically relates to Wikipedia:Verifiability, which requires all of the article to be verified. Thank you for submitting this article at Did You Know! Please feel free to read the 5 DYK criteria I linked above to help you and your students learn how an article passes Did You Know. Thank you for reading :) --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
@BeaClaire and Carrolquadrio: Although MrLinkinPark333 is correct and this article fails the "newness" criterion of DYK, I think we should give some leeway to a student who will not be aware of the DYK criteria. The nominator has been responsible for the expansion of this article from a short stub, its just that it took them longer than the seven-day timeframe we usually allow. In other respects, the article is long enough, the hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues. You need to add a few citations as mentioned by MrLinkinPark333, and then we should be good to go. No QPQ is needed here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- User:Cwmhiraeth Thank you for your response. I have taken care to add citations to the areas which MrLinkinPark333 flagged previously. Additionally, all citations have been added to the reference list and where else required. Thank you again for your consideration. BeaClaire (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. This is good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth, BeaClaire, and MrLinkinPark333: wonderful community effort, thank you for the positive experience. Carrolquadrio (talk) 09:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)