Talk:Commonwealth Heritage List

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: History Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Commonwealth Heritage List is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian history (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Question edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Question: is the list in the page complete? Suggestion: categorize. --Muhandes (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, with ~400 properties on the list, there was up until today, only one lace listed. I have removed that one place and add a link to the category which has (at time of writing) about 50 names on the list. Rangasyd (talk) 12:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

comments edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The correct way to refer to the List is as Australian National Heritage List.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.223.121 (talk) 01:36, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, that is incorrect. There is the Australian National Heritage List, that is very different from the Commonwealth Heritage List. Please refer to the references for disambiguation. Rangasyd (talk) 12:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic