Talk:Common Surinam toad

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sophieeichler in topic Peer Review

But it wasn't a canonical merger. This page used to be about the genus, so I sent it to Pipa (genus); most of the content here is from the old Suriname Toad which was functionally the species page. 4pq1injbok (talk) 14:16, 5 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

It is described in the top description as being threatened by habitat loss, yet it is in the least concern category in the displayed graph. I think this sentence should therefore be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.162.195 (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


It might be useful to include that the females don't die after giving birth. I don't have any individually reliable looking sources, but my cursory search on Google supports me. 50.90.95.26 (talk) 20:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

mating edit

The old page [1] made more clear the male's "movements" and egg fertilization. --96.233.93.162 (talk) 00:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kite edit

"Pipa" means kite in Portuguese. This is where the name comes from. Jgsodre (talk) 18:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common Suriname toad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Conservation Status edit

In the introductory paragraph it says that Suriname toads are threatened by habitat loss, but in the chart on the right it lists the toad as "least concern." Is this a problem? York12321 (talk) 00:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Description edit

The spelling of the name switches suddenly from "Surinam" to "Suriname" in the Description paragraph. If there is a reason for this, it should be made clear (for example - if I might offer a fictitious-as-far-as-I-know reason: "note that Suriname and Surinam are both acceptable phonetic transcriptions of the name"). If there is no reason and it is a typo, it should be corrected. I do not know enough about the subject matter to offer an opinion one way or the other; my comment is offered purely as that of a confused layperson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.220.124.148 (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022 edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Qinan123 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Hoonji2022, Sophieeichler, Turturenhydra.

— Assignment last updated by Eurquhart02 (talk) 23:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review Edits and Comments edit

Great start to the frog entry! I revised the entry by reordering and combining sections on the Wikipedia page to make reading easier to follow. I also revised the information in the "Habitat and Distribution" section by removing redundant words and sentences in order to make the section more concise. With regards to the frog's behavior and diet, it would be greatly beneficial if a discussion on the frog's predators and predatory defense was introduced. Describing specific conservation methods to counter habitat loss in the conservation section would also improve the content of the frog entry. Hoonji2022 (talk) 21:18, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review edit

This animal is super interesting, and I think the Wikipedia page was easy to read and understand. Overall, it is a great article.

I revised the entry by reordering and recombining sections on the Wikipedia page. Previously, the Wikipedia page had Behavior section with 3 subsections: Feeding, Reproduction, and Mating Competition. However, considering the length of these subsections, I thought that they could all be independent sections. After the revision, the Wikipedia page has 3 new sections: Feeding Behavior, Reproduction, and Mating. And the Mating section has Male/male interactions as a subsection (originally Mating Competition).

I also revised the information in the Male/male interactions subsection by rewording some of the sentences in order to enhance the grammatical flow of the subsection.

One suggestion to improve the Wikipedia page would be adding more information in the Mating section. I found a useful source that can potentially be used to add more information about the mating behavior and egg-laying behavior: https://doi.org/10.2307/1439751.

Turturenhydra (talk) 15:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


Overall, this page is in excellent shape! This species is very interesting, especially its reproductive habits. I made some minor edits only. I rearranged the order of some paragraphs in order for the information to be presented in a more organized manner. I also added a few links to other Wikipedia pages. --Sophieeichler (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply